The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
SATURDAY
AUGst 11.
IN CONVENTION
Mr. MADISON & Mr. RUTLIDGE
moved "that each House shall keep a journal of its proceeding,
1 & shall publish the same from
time to time; except such part of the proceedings of the Senate,
when acting not in its Legislative capacity as may be judged by that
House to require secrecy."
Mr. MERCER. This implies that
other powers than legislative will be given to the Senate which he
hoped would not be given. Mr. Madison & Mr. R's motion. was disagd.
to by all the States except Virga.
Mr. GERRY & Mr. SHARMAN
moved to insert after the words "publish them" the following "except
such as relate to treaties & military operations." Their object was
to give each House a discretion in such cases. — On this question
N. H. no. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Va. no. N.
C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no. 2
Mr. ELSEWORTH. As the clause is
objectionable in so many shapes, it may as well be struck out
altogether. The Legislature will not fail to publish their
proceedings from time to time. The people will call for it if it
should be improperly omitted.
Mr. WILSON thought the
expunging of the clause would be very improper. The people have a
right to know what their Agents are doing or have done, and it
should not be in the option of the Legislature to conceal their
proceedings. Besides as this is a clause in the existing
confederation, the not retaining it would furnish the adversaries of
the reform with a pretext by which week & suspicious minds may be
easily misled.
Mr. MASON thought it would give
a just alarm to the people, to make a conclave of their Legislature.
Mr. SHERMAN thought the
Legislature might be trusted in this case if in any.
3 Question on
4 1st. part of the section down to "publish
them" inclusive: 5 Agreed to
nem. con.
3 Question on the words to
follow, to wit except such parts thereof as may in their Judgment
require secrecy." N. H. divd. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. no.
Del. no. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. ay.
6
The remaining part as to yeas & nays, — 7
agreed to nem. con.
Art VI. Sect. 8. 8,
9 taken up.
Mr. KING remarked that the
section authorized the 2 Houses to adjourn to a new place. He
thought this inconvenient. The mutability of place had dishonored
the federal Govt. and would require as strong a cure as we could
devise. He thought a law at least should be made necessary to a
removal of the Seat of Govt. Mr. MADISON,
viewed the subject in the same light, and joined with Mr. King in a
motion requiring a law.
Mr. GOVERNr. MORRIS
proposed the additional alteration by inserting the words "during
the Session" &c."
Mr. SPAIGHT. this will fix the
seat of Govt. at N. Y. The present Congress will convene them there
in the first instance, and they will never be able to remove;
especially if the Presidt. should be 10
Northern Man.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
such a distrust is inconsistent with all Govt.
Mr. MADISON supposed that a
central place for the seat of Govt. was so just and wd. be so must
insisted on by the H. of Representatives, that though a law should
be made requisite for the purpose, it could & would be obtained. The
necessity of a central residence of the Govt. wd. be much greater
under the new than old Govt. The members of the new Govt. wd. be
more numerous. They would be taken more from the interior parts of
the States; they wd. not like members of ye. present Congs. come so
often from the distant States by water. As the powers & objects of
the new Govt. would be far greater yn. heretofore, more private
individuals wd. have business calling them to the seat of it, and it
was more necessary that the Govt. should be in that position from
which it could contemplate with the most equal eye, and sympathize
most equally with, every part of the nation. These considerations he
supposed would extort a removal even if a law were made necessary.
But in order to quiet suspicions both within & without doors, it
might not be amiss to authorize the 2 Houses by a concurrent vote to
adjourn at their first meeting to the most proper place, and to
require thereafter, the sanction of a law to their removal.
The motion was accordingly moulded into the following form — "the
Legislature shall at their first assembling determine on a place at
which their future sessions shall be held; neither House shall
afterwards, during the session of the House of Reps. without the
consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor shall
they adjourn to any other place than such as shall have been fixt by
law"
Mr. GERRY thought it would be
wrong to let the Presidt. check the will of the 2 Houses on this
subject at all
Mr. WILLIAMSON supported the
ideas of Mr. Spaight
Mr. CARROL was actuated by the
same apprehensions
Mr. MERCER, it will serve no
purpose to require the two Houses at their first meeting to fix on a
place. They will never agree. After some further expressions from
others denoting an apprehension that the seat of Govt. might be
continued at an improper place if a law should be made necessary to
a removal, and 11 the motion
above stated with another for recommitting the section had been
negatived, the section was left in the shape it which it was
reported as to this point. The words "during the session of the
Legislature were prefixed to the 8th section — and the last sentence
"But this regulation shall not extend to the Senate when it shall
exercise the powers mention 12
in the _____ article" struck struck out. The 8th. section as amended
was then agreed to.
Mr. RANDOLPH moved according to
notice to reconsider Art: IV. Sect. 5. 13
concerning money-bills which had been struck out. He argued 1.
14 that he had not wished for
this privilege whilst a proportional Representation in the Senate
was in contemplation, but since an equality had been fixed in that
house, the large States would require this compensation at least. 2.
14 that it would make the plan
more acceptable to the people, because they will consider the Senate
as the more aristocratic body, and will expect that the usual guards
agst. its influence 15 be
provided according to the example in 16
G. Britain. 3. 14 the privilege
will give some advantage to the House of Reps. if it extends to the
originating only — but still more, if it restrains the Senate from
amendg. 4. 14 he called on the
smaller States to concur in the measure, as the condition by which
alone the compromise had entitled them to an equality in the Senate.
He signified that he should propose instead of the original Section,
a clause specifying that the bills in question should be for the
purpose of Revenue, in order to repel ye. objection agst. the extent
of the words "raising money," which might happen
incidentally, and that the Senate should not so amend or alter as to
increase or diminish the sum; in order to obviate the inconveniences
urged agst. a restriction of the Senate to a simple affirmative or
negative.
Mr. WILLIAMSON 2ded. the motion
Mr. PINKNEY was sorry to oppose
the opportunity gentlemen asked to have the question again opened
for discussion, but as he considered it a mere waste of time he
could not bring himself to consent to it. He said that
notwithstanding what had been said as to the compromise, he always
considered this section as making no part of it. The rule of
Representation in the 1st. branch was the true condition of that in
the 2d. branch. — Several others spoke for & agst. the
reconsideration, but without going into the merits — On the Question
to reconsider
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. 17
ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. divd. Geo. ay.
— 18 Monday was then assigned —
19
Adjd.
1. The transcript uses the word
"proceeding" in the plural.
2. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Massachusetts, Connecticut, aye — 2; New Hampshire, New
Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, no — 8."
3. The words "On the" are here
inserted in the transcript.
4. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
5. The words "it was" are here
inserted in the transcript.
6. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Virginia, North
Carolina, Georgia, aye — 6; Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South
Carolina, no — 4; New Hampshire, divided."
7. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
8. See ante.
9. The words "was then" are here
inserted in the transcript.
10. The word "a" is here
inserted in the transcript.
11. The word "after" is here
inserted in the transcript.
12. The word "mentioned" is
substituted in the transcript for "mention."
13. See ante.
14. The figures "1," "2," "3"
and "4" are changed in the transcript to "first," "Secondly" etc.
15. The word "will' is here
inserted in the transcript.
16. The word "of" is substituted
in the transcript for "in".
17. In the printed Journal N.
Jersey — No.
18. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey,
17 Pennsylvania, Delaware,
Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, aye — 9; Maryland, no — 1; South
Carolina, divided."
19. The words "for the
reconsideration" are here inserted in the transcript.