The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
TUESDAY
AUG. 14.
IN CONVENTION
Article VI. Sect. 9. 1,
2 taken up.
Mr. PINKNEY argued that the
making the members ineligible to offices was degrading to
them, and the more improper as their election into the Legislature
implied that they had the confidence of the people; that it was
inconvenient, because the Senate might be supposed to contain
the fittest men. He hoped to see that body become a School of public
Ministers, a nursery of Statesmen: that it was impolitic,
because the Legislature would cease to be a magnet to the first
talents and abilities. He moved to postpone the section in order to
take up the following proposition viz — "the members of each House
shall be incapable of holding any office under the U.S. for which
they or any of 3 others for their
benefit receive any salary, fees, or emoluments of any kind — and
the acceptance of such office shall vacate their seats respectively"
Genl. MIFFLIN 2ded. the motion.
Col. MASON ironically proposed to strike
out the whole section, as a more effectual expedient for encouraging
that exotic corruption which might not otherwise thrive so well in
the American Soil — for compleating that Aristocracy which was
probably in the contemplation of some among us, and for inviting
into the Legislative Service, those generous & benevolent characters
who will do justice to each other's merit, by carving out offices &
rewards for it. In the present state of American morals & manners,
few friends it may be thought will be lost to the plan, by the
opportunity of giving premiums to a mercenary & depraved ambition.
Mr. MERCER. It is a first
principle in political science, that wherever the rights of property
are secured, an aristocracy will grow out of it. Elective
Governments also necessarily become aristocratic, because the rulers
being few can & will draw emoluments for themselves from the many.
The Governments of America will become aristocracies. They are so
already. The public measures are calculated for the benefit of the
Governors, not of the people. The people are dissatisfied &
complain. They change their rulers, and the public measures are
changed, but it is only a change of one scheme of emolument to the
rulers, for another. The people gain nothing by it, but an addition
of instability & uncertainty to their other evils. — Governmts. can
only be maintained by force or influence. The
Executive has not force, deprive him of influence
4 by rendering the members of the
Legislature ineligible to Executive offices, and he becomes a mere
phantom of authority. The aristocratic part will not even let him in
for a share of the plunder. The Legislature must & will be composed
of wealth & abilities, and the people will be governed by a Junto.
The Executive ought to have a Council, being members of both Houses.
Without such an influence, the war will be between the aristocracy &
the people. He wished it to be between the Aristocracy & the
Executive. Nothing else can protect the people agst. those
speculating Legislatures which are now plundering them throughout
the U. States.
Mr. GERRY read a resolution of
the Legislature of Massts. passed before the Act of Congs.
recommending the Convention, in which her deputies were instructed
not to depart from the rotation established in the 5th. art: of
5 Confederation, nor to agree in
any case to give to the members of Congs. a capacity to hold offices
under the Government. This he said was repealed in consequence of
the Act of Congs. with which the State thought it proper to comply
in an unqualified manner. The Sense of the State however was still
the same. He could not think with Mr. Pinkney that the
disqualification was degrading. Confidence is the road to tyranny.
As to Ministers & Ambassadors few of them were necessary. It is the
opinion of a great many that they ought to be discontinued, on our
part; that none may be sent among us, & that source of influence be
6 shut up. If the Senate were to
appoint Ambassadors as seemed to be intended, they will multiply
embassies for their own sakes. He was not so fond of those
productions as to wish to establish nurseries for them. If they are
once appointed, the House of Reps. will be obliged to provide
salaries for them, whether they approve of the measures or not. If
men will not serve in the Legislature without a prospect of such
offices, our situation is deplorable indeed. If our best Citizens
are actuated by such mercenary views, we had better chuse a single
despot at once. It will be more easy to satisfy the rapacity of one
than of many. According to the idea of one Gentlemen [Mr. Mercer]
our Government it seems is to be a Govt. of plunder. In that case it
certainly would be prudent to have but one rather than many to be
employed in it. We cannot be too circumspect in the formation of
this System. It will be examined on all sides and with a very
suspicious eye. The People who have been so lately in arms agst. G.
B. for their liberties, will not easily give them up. He lamented
the evils existing at present under our Governments, but imputed
them to the faults of those in office, not to the people. The
misdeeds of the former will produce a critical attention to the
opportunities afforded by the new system to like or greater abuses.
As it now stands it is as compleat an aristocracy as ever was framed
If great powers should be given to the Senate we shall be governed
in reality by a Junto as has been apprehended. He remarked that it
would be very differently constituted from Congs — 1.
7 there will be but 2 deputies from each
State, in Congs. there may be 7. and are generally 5. — 2.
8 they are chosen for six years,
those of Congs. annually. 3. 9
they are not subject to recall; those of Congs. are. 4. In Congs. 9
States 10 are necessary
for all great purposes — here 8 persons will suffice. Is it
to be presumed that the people will ever agree to such a system? He
moved to render the members of the H. of Reps. as well as of the
Senate ineligible not only during, but for one year after the
expiration of their terms. — If it should be thought that this will
injure the Legislature by keeping out of it men of abilities who are
willing to serve in other offices it may be required as a
qualification for other offices, that the Candidate shall have
served a certain time in the Legislature.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
Exclude the officers of the army & navy, and you form a band having
a different interest from & opposed to the civil power: you
stimulate them to despise & reproach those "talking Lords who dare
not face the foe." Let this spirit be roused at the end of a war,
before your troops shall have laid down their arms, and though the
Civil authority "be intrenched in parchment to the teeth" they will
cut their way to it. He was agst. rendering the members of the
Legislature ineligible to offices. He was for rendering them
eligible agn. after having vacated their Seats by accepting office.
Why should we not avail ourselves of their services if the people
chuse to give them their confidence. There can be little danger of
corruption either among the people or the Legislatures who are to be
the Electors. If they say, we see their merits, we honor the men, we
chuse to renew our confidence in them, have they not a right to give
them a preference; and can they be properly abridged of it. Mr.
WILLIAMSON; introduced his opposition to the
motion by referring to the question concerning "money bills." That
clause he said was dead. Its ghost he was afraid would
notwithstanding haunt us. It had been a matter of conscience with
him, to insist upon 11 it as
long as there was hope of retaining it. He had swallowed the vote of
rejection, with reluctance. He could not digest it. All that was
said on the other side was that the restriction was not
convenient. We have now got a House of Lords which is to
originate money-bills. — To avoid another inconveniency,
12 we are to have a whole
Legislature at liberty to cut out offices for one another. He
thought a self-denying ordinance for ourselves would be more proper.
Bad as the Constitution has been made by expunging the restriction
on the Senate concerning money bills he did not wish to make it
worse by expunging the present Section. He had scarcely seen a
single corrupt measure in the Legislature of N. Carolina, which
could not be traced up to office hunting.
Mr. SHERMAN. The Constitution
shd. lay as few temptations as possible in the way of those in
power. Men of abilities will increase as the Country grows more
populous and, and 13 the means
of education are more diffused.
Mr. PINKNEY. No State has
rendered the members of the Legislature ineligible to offices. In S.
Carolina the Judges are eligible into the Legislature. It can not be
supposed then that the motion will be offensive to the people. If
the State Constitutions should be revised he believed restrictions
of this sort wd. be rather diminished than multiplied.
Mr. WILSON could not approve of
the Section as it stood, and could not give up his judgment to any
supposed objections that might arise among the people. He considered
himself as acting & responsible for the welfare of millions not
immediately represented in this House. He had also asked himself the
serious question what he should say to his constituents in case they
should call upon him to tell them why he sacrified his own Judgment
in a case where they authorised him to exercise it? Were he to own
to them that he sacrificed it in order to flatter their prejudices,
he should dread the retort: did you suppose the people of Penna. had
not good sense enough to receive a good Government? Under this
impression he should certainly follow his own Judgment which
disapproved of the section. He would remark in addition to the
objections urged agst. it, that as one branch of the Legislature was
to be appointed by the Legislatures of the States, the other by the
people of the States, as both are to be paid by the States, and to
be appointable to State offices, nothing seemed to be wanting to
prostrate the Natl. Legislature, but to render its members
ineligible to Natl. offices, & by that means take away its power of
attracting those talents which were necessary to give weight to the
Governt. and to render it useful to the people. He was far from
thinking the ambition which aspired to Offices of dignity and trust,
an ignoble or culpable one. He was sure it was not politic to regard
it in that light, or to withold from it the prospect of those
rewards, which might engage it in the career of public service. He
observed that the State of Penna. which had gone as far as any State
into the policy of fettering power, had not rendered the members of
the Legislature ineligible to offices of Govt.
Mr. ELSWORTH did not think the
mere postponement of the reward would be any material discouragement
of merit. Ambitious minds will serve 2 years or 7 years in the
Legislature for the sake of qualifying themselves for other offices.
This he thought a sufficient security for obtaining the services of
the ablest men in the Legislature, although whilst members they
should be ineligible to Public offices. Besides, merit will be most
encouraged, when most impartially rewarded. If rewards are to
circulate only within the Legislature, merit out of it will be
discouraged.
Mr. MERCER was extremely
anxious on this point. What led to the appointment of this
Convention? The corruption & mutability of the Legislative Councils
of the States. If the plan does not remedy these, it will not
recommend itself; and we shall not be able in our private capacities
to support & enforce it: nor will the best part of our Citizens
exert themselves for the purpose. — It is a great mistake to suppose
that the paper we are to propose will govern the U. States? It is
The men whom it will bring into the Governt. and interest in
maintaining it that is 14 to
govern them. The paper will only mark out the mode & the form. Men
are the substance and must do the business. All Govt. must be by
force or influence. It is not the King of France — but 200,000
janisaries of power that govern that Kingdom. There will be no such
force here; influence then must be substituted; and he would ask
whether this could be done, if the members of the Legislature should
be ineligible to offices of State; whether such a disqualification
would not determine all the most influencial men to stay at home,
and & prefer appointments within their respective States.
Mr. WILSON was by no means
satisfied with the answer given by Mr. Elsewoth to the argument as
to the discouragement of merit. The members must either go a second
time into the Legislature, and disqualify themselves — or say to
their Constituents, we served you before only from the mercenary
view of qualifying ourselves for offices, and haveg answered this
purpose we do not chuse to be again elected.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
put the case of a war, and the Citizen the 15
most capable of conducting it, happening to be a member of the
Legislature. What might have been the consequence of such a
regulation at the commencement, or even in the Course of the late
contest for our liberties?
On 16 question for postponing
in order to take up Mr. Pinkneys motion, it was lost.
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va.
ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. divd. 17
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
moved to insert, after "office," except offices in the army or navy:
but in that case their offices shall be vacated.
Mr. BROOM 2ds. him.
Mr. RANDOLPH had been & should
continue uniformly opposed to the striking out of the clause; as
opening a door for influence & corruption. No arguments had made any
impression on him, but those which related to the case of war, and a
co-existing incapacity of the fittest commanders to be employed. He
admitted great weight in these, and would agree to the exception
proposed by Mr. Govr. Morris.
Mr. BUTLER & Mr. PINKNEY
urged a general postponemt. of 9 Sect. Art. VI. till it should be
seen what powers would be vested in the Senate, when it would be
more easy to judge of the expediency of allowing the officers of
State to be chosen out of that body. — a general postponement was
agreed to nem. con.
Art: VI. sect. 10. 18,
19 taken up — "that members be paid
by their respective States."
Mr. ELSEWORTH said that in
reflecting on this subject he had been satisfied that too much
dependence on the States would be produced by this mode of payment.
He moved to strike 20 out and
insert "that they should" be paid out of the Treasury of the U.S. an
allowance not exceeding (blank) dollars per day or the present value
thereof.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS,
remarked that if the members were to be paid by the States it would
throw an unequal burden on the distant States, which would be unjust
as the Legislature was to be a national Assembly. He moved that the
payment be out of the Natl. Treasury; leaving the quantum to the
discretion of the Natl. Legislature. There could be no reason to
fear that they would overpay themselves.
Mr. BUTLER contended for
payment by the States; particularly in the case of the Senate, who
will be so long out of their respective States, that they will lose
sight of their Constituents unless dependent on them for their
support.
Mr. LANGDON was agst. payment
by the States. There would be some difficulty in fixing the sum; but
it would be unjust to oblige the distant States to bear the expence
of their members in travelling to and from the Seat of Govt.
Mr. MADISON. If the H. of Reps.
is to be chosen biennially — and the Senate to be
constantly dependent on the Legislatures which are chosen
annually, he could not see any chance for that stability in the
Genl. Govt. the want of which was a principal evil in the State
Govts. His fear was that the organization of the Govt. supposing the
Senate to be really independt. for six years, would not effect our
purpose. It was nothing more than a combination of the peculiarities
of two of the State Govts. which separately had been found
insufficient. The Senate was formed on the model of that of Maryld.
The Revisionary check, on that of N. York. What the effect of a
union of these provisions might be, could not be foreseen. The
enlargement of the sphere of the Government was indeed a
circumstance which he thought would be favorable as he had on
several occasions undertaken to shew. He was however for fixing at
least two extremes not to be exceeded by the Natl. Legislre. in the
payment of themselves.
Mr. GERRY. There are
difficulties on both sides. The observation of Mr. Butler has weight
in it. On the other side, the State Legislatures may turn out the
Senators by reducing their salaries. Such things have been
practised.
Col. MASON. It has not yet been noticed
that the clause as it now stands makes the House of Represents. also
dependent on the State Legislatures; so that both houses will be
made the instruments of the politics of the States whatever they may
be.
Mr. BROOM could see no danger
in trusting the Genl. Legislature with the payment of themselves.
The State Legislatures had this power, and no complaint had been
made of it.
Mr. SHERMAN was not afraid that
the Legislature would make their own wages too high; but too low, so
that men ever so fit could not serve unless they were at the same
time rich. He thought the best plan would be to fix a moderate
allowance to be paid out of the Natl. Treasy. and let the States
make such additions as they might judge fit. He moved that 5 dollars
per day be the sum, any further emoluments to be added by the
States.
Mr. CARROL had been much
surprised at seeing this clause in the Report. The dependence of
both Houses on the State Legislatures is compleat; especially as the
members of the former are eligible to State offices. The States can
now say: if you do not comply with our wishes, we will starve you:
if you do we will reward you. The new Govt. in this form was nothing
more than a second edition of Congress in two volumes, instead of
one, and perhaps with very few amendments —
Mr. DICKENSON took it for
granted that all were convinced of the necessity of making the Genl.
Govt. independent of the prejudices, passions, and improper views of
the State Legislatures. The contrary of This was effected by the
section as it stands. On the other hand there were objections agst.
taking a permanent standard as wheat which had been suggested on a
former occasion, as well as against leaving the matter to the
pleasure of the Natl. Legislature. He proposed that an Act should be
passed every 12 years by the Natl. Legislre. settling the quantum of
their wages. If the Genl. Govt. should be left dependent on the
State Legislatures, it would be happy for us if we had never met in
this Room.
Mr. ELSEWORTH was not unwilling
himself to trust the Legislature with authority to regulate their
own wages, but well knew that an unlimited discretion for that
purpose would produce strong, tho' perhaps not insuperable
objections. He thought changes in the value of money, provided for
by his motion in the words, "or the present value thereof."
Mr. L. MARTIN. As the Senate is
to represent the States, the members of it ought to be paid by the
States.
Mr. CARROL. The Senate was to
represent & manage the affairs of the whole, and not to be the
advocates of State interests. They ought then not to be dependent on
nor paid by the States.
On the question for paying the Members of the Legislature out of
the Natl. Treasury,
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va.
ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. ay. 21
Mr. ELSEWTH moved that the pay
be fixed at 5 dollrs. or the present value thereof per day during
their attendance & for every thirty miles in travelling to & from
Congress.
Mr. STRONG preferred 4 dollars,
leaving the Sts. at liberty to make additions.
On 22 question for fixing the
pay at 5 dollars.
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. no. Va.
ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no. 23
Mr. DICKENSON proposed that the
wages of the members of both houses Sd. be required to be the same.
Mr. BROOME seconded him.
Mr. GHORUM. this would be
unreasonable. The Senate will be detained longer from home, will be
obliged to remove their families, and in time of war perhaps to sit
constantly. Their allowance should certainly be higher. The members
of the Senates in the States are allowed more, than those of the
other house. Mr. DICKENSON
withdrew his motion
It was moved & agreed to amend the Section by adding — "to be
ascertained by law."
The Section [Art VI. Sec. 10] as amended, agreed to nem. con.
Adjd.
1. See ante.
2. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
3. The word "of" is omitted in
the trancript.
4. The transcript italicizes the
word "influence."
5. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
6. The word "be" is omitted in
the transcript.
7. The figure "1" is changed to
"In the first place" in the transcript.
8. The figure "2" is changed to
"In the second place" in the transcript.
9. The figure "3" is changed to
"In the third place" in the transcript.
10. The phrase "And finally, in
Congress nine States" is substituted in the transcript for "4. In
Congs. 9 States."
11. The word "on" is substituted
in the transcript for "upon."
12. The word "inconveniency" is
changed to " nconvenience" in the transcript.
13. The word "as" is substituted
in the transcript for "and."
14. The word "are" is
substituted in the transcript for "is."
15. The word "the" is omitted in
the transcript.
16. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
17. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia,
aye — 5; Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, North Carolina,
South Carolina, no — 5; Georgia, divided."
18. See ante.
19. The words "was then" are
here inserted in the transcript.
20. The word "it" is here
inserted in the transcript.
21. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, aye — 9;
Massachusetts, South Carolina, no — 2."
22. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
23. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Connecticut, Virginia, aye — 2; New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, no — 9."