The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
THURSDAY
AUGUST 16.
IN CONVENTION
Mr. RANDOLPH having thrown into
a new form the motion, putting votes, Resolutions &c. on a footing
with Bills, renewed it as follows "Every order resolution or
vote, to which the concurrence of the Senate & House of Reps. may be
necessary (except on a question of adjournment and in the cases
hereinafter mentioned) shall be presented to the President for his
revision; and before the same shall have force shall be approved by
him, or being disapproved by him shall be repassed by the Senate &
House of Reps. according to the rules & limitations prescribed in
the case of a Bill."
Mr. SHERMAN thought it
unnecessary, except as to votes taking money out of the Treasury
which might be provided for in another place.
On 1 Question as moved by Mr.
Randolph 2
N. H. ay. Mas: not present, Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay.
Md. ay. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 3
The Amendment was made a Section 14. of Art VI.
Art: VII. Sect. 1. 4,
5 taken up.
Mr. L. MARTIN asked what was
meant by the Committee of detail in the expression "duties"
and "imposts." If the meaning were the same, the former was
unnecessary; if different, the matter ought to be made clear.
Mr. WILSON, duties are
applicable to many objects to which the word imposts does not
relate. The latter are appropriated to commerce; the former extend
to a variety of objects, as stamp duties &c.
Mr. CARROLL reminded the
Convention of the great difference of interests among the States,
and doubts the propriety in that point of view of letting a majority
be a quorum.
Mr. MASON urged the necessity
of connecting with the power of levying taxes duties &c, the
prohibition in Sect 4 of art VI that no tax should be laid on
exports. He was unwilling to trust to its being done in a future
article. He hoped the Northn. States did not mean to deny the
Southern this security. It would hereafter be as desirable to the
former when the latter should become the most populous. He professed
his jealousy for the productions of the Southern or as he called
them, the staple States. He moved to insert the following amendment
"provided that no tax duty or imposition shall be laid by the
Legislature of the U. States on articles exported from any State"
Mr. SHERMAN had no objection to
the proviso here, other than 6 it
would derange the parts of the report as made by the Committee, to
take them in such an order.
Mr. RUTLIDGE. It being of no
consequence in what order points are decided, he should vote for the
clause as it stood, but on condition that the subsequent part
relating to negroes should also be agreed to.
Mr. GOVERNEUR MORRIS
considered such a proviso as inadmissible any where. It was so
radically objectionable, that it might cost the whole system the
support of some members. He contended that it would not in some
cases be equitable to tax imports without taxing exports; and that
taxes on exports would be often the most easy and proper of the two.
Mr. MADISON 1.
7 the power of taxing 8
exports is proper in itself, and as the States can not with
propriety exercise it separately, it ought to be vested in them
collectively. 2. 7 it might with
particular advantage be exercised with regard to articles in which
America was not rivalled in foreign markets, as Tobo. &c. The
contract between the French Farmers Genl. and Mr. Morris stipulating
that if taxes sd. be laid in America on the export of Tobo. they sd.
be paid by the Farmers, shewed that it was understood by them, that
the price would be thereby raised in America, and consequently the
taxes be paid by the European Consumer. 3. 9
it would be unjust to the States whose produce was exported by their
neighbours, to leave it subject to be taxed by the latter. This was
a grievance which had already filled N. H. Cont. N. Jery. Del: and
N. Carolina with loud complaints, as it related to imports, and they
would be equally authorised by taxes by the States on exports. 4.
9 The Southn. States being most
in danger and most needing naval protection, could the less complain
if the burden should be somewhat heaviest on them. 5.
10 we are not providing for the present moment
only, and time will equalize the situation of the States in this
matter. He was for these reasons agst. the motion
Mr. WILLIAMSON considered the
clause proposed agst. taxes on exports as reasonable and necessary.
Mr. ELSEWORTH was agst. Taxing
exports; but thought the prohibition stood in the most proper place,
and was agst. deranging the order reported by the Committee
Mr. WILSON was decidedly agst.
prohibiting general taxes on exports. He dwelt on the injustice and
impolicy of leaving N. Jersey Connecticut &c any longer subject to
the exactions of their commercial neighbours.
Mr. GERRY thought the
legislature could not be trusted with such a power. It might ruin
the Country. It might be exercised partially, raising one and
depressing another part of it.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
However the legislative power may be formed, it will if disposed be
able to ruin the Country. He considered the taxing of exports to be
in many cases highly politic. Virginia has found her account in
taxing Tobacco. All Countries having peculiar articles tax the
exportation of them; as France her wines and brandies. A tax here on
lumber, would fall on the W. Indies & punish their restrictions on
our trade. The same is true of live stock and in some degree of
flour. In case of a dearth in the West Indies, we may extort what we
please. Taxes on exports are a necessary source of revenue. For a
long time the people of America will not have money to pay direct
taxes. Seize and sell their effects and you push them into Revolts.
Mr. MERCER was strenuous
against giving Congress power to tax exports. Such taxes were
11 impolitic, as encouraging the
raising of articles not meant for exportation. The States had now a
right where their situation permitted, to tax both the imports and
exports of their uncommercial neighbours. It was enough for them to
sacrifice one half of it. It had been said the Southern States had
most need of naval protection. The reverse was the case. Were it not
for promoting the carrying trade of the Northn. States, the Southn.
States could let their trade go into foreign bottoms, where it would
not need our protection. Virginia by taxing her tobacco had given an
advantage to that of Maryland.
Mr. SHERMAN. To examine and
compare the States in relation to imports and exports will be
opening a boundless field. He thought the matter had been adjusted,
and that imports were to be subject, and exports not, to be taxed.
He thought it wrong to tax exports except it might be such articles
as ought not to be exported. The complexity of the business in
America would render an equal tax on exports impracticable. The
oppression of the uncommercial States was guarded agst. by the power
to regulate trade between the States. As to compelling foreigners,
that might be done by regulating trade in general. The Government
would not be trusted with such a power. Objections are most likely
to be excited by considerations relating to taxes & money. A power
to tax exports would shipwreck the whole.
Mr. CARROL was surprised that
any objection should be made to an exception of exports from the
power of taxation.
It was finally agreed that the question concerning exports shd.
lie over for the place in which the exception stood in the report:
Maryd. alone voting agst. it
Sect: 1. [art. VII] 12,
13 agreed to: Mr. GERRY
alone answering no.
14 Clause for regulating
commerce with foreign nations &c.; 15
agreed to nem. con.
16 for coining money. agd. to
nem. con.
16 for regulating foreign coin.
do. do.
16 for fixing the standard of
weights & measures. do. do.
17 "To establish post-offices."
Mr. GERRY moved to add, and
post-roads.
Mr. MERCER 2ded. & on
18 question
N. H. no. Mas. ay. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pena. no. Del. ay. Md. ay.
Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 19
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
moved to strike out "and emit bills on the credit of the U. States"
— If the United States had credit such bills would be unnecessary:
if they had not, unjust & useless.
Mr. BUTLER, 2ds. the motion.
Mr. MADISON, will it not be
sufficient to prohibit the making them a tender? This will
remove the temptation to emit them with unjust views. And promissory
notes in that shape may in some emergencies be best.
Mr. Govr. MORRIS. striking out
the words will leave room still for notes of a responsible
minister which will do all the good without the mischief. The Monied
interest will oppose the plan of Government, if paper emissions be
not prohibited.
Mr. GHORUM was for striking
out, without inserting any prohibition. if the words stand they may
suggest and lead to the measure.
Col. 20 MASON
had doubts on the subject. Congs. he thought would not have the
power unless it were expressed. Though he had a mortal hatred to
paper money, yet as he could not foresee all emergences, he was
unwilling to tie the hands of the Legislature. He observed that the
late war could not have been carried on, had such a prohibition
existed.
Mr. GHORUM. The power as far as
it will be necessary or safe, is involved in that of borrowing.
Mr. MERCER was a friend to
paper money, though in the present state & temper of America, he
should neither propose nor approve of such a measure. He was
consequently opposed to a prohibition of it altogether. It will
stamp suspicion on the Government to deny it a discretion on this
point. It was impolitic also to excite the opposition of all those
who were friends to paper money. The people of property would be
sure to be on the side of the plan, and it was impolitic to purchase
their further attachment with the loss of the opposite class of
Citizens
Mr. ELSEWORTH thought this a
favorable moment to shut and bar the door against paper money. The
mischiefs of the various experiments which had been made, were now
fresh in the public mind and had excited the disgust of all the
respectable part of America. By witholding the power from the new
Governt. more friends of influence would be gained to it than by
almost any thing else. Paper money can in no case be necessary. Give
the Government credit, and other resources will offer. The power may
do harm, never good.
Mr. RANDOLPH, notwithstanding
his antipathy to paper money, could not agree to strike out the
words, as he could not foresee all the occasions which
21 might arise.
Mr. WILSON. It will have a most
salutary influence on the credit of the U. States to remove the
possibility of paper money. This expedient can never succeed whilst
its mischiefs are remembered, and as long as it can be resorted to,
it will be a bar to other resources.
Mr. BUTLER. remarked that paper
was a legal tender in no Country in Europe. He was urgent for
disarming the Government of such a power.
Mr. MASON was still averse to
tying the hands of the Legislature altogether. If there was
no example in Europe as just remarked, it might be observed on the
other side, that there was none in which the Government was
restrained on this head.
Mr. READ, thought the words, if
not struck out, would be as alarming as the mark of the Beast in
Revelations.
Mr. LANGDON had rather reject
the whole plan than retain the three words "(and emit bills")
On the motion for striking out
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct ay. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va.
ay. *23 N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo.
ay. 22
The clause for borrowing money, 25
agreed to nem. con.
Adjd.
1. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
2. The phrase "it was agreed to"
is here inserted in the transcript.
3. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Delaware,
Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye —
9; New Jetsey, no — 1; Massachusetts, not present."
4. See ante.
5. The words "was then" are here
in inserted in the transcript.
6. The word "that" is here
inserted in the transcript.
7. The figures "1" and "2" are
changed in the transcript to "First" and "Secondly."
8. The words "laying taxes on"
are substituted in the transcript for "taxing."
9. The figures "3" and "4" are
changed in the transcript to Thirdly" and "Fourthly."
10. The figure "5" is changed in
the transcript to "And finally."
11. The word "are" is
substituted in the transcript for "were."
12. This phrase was erroncously
copied in the transcript as "Article 1, Section 1," but was
corrected when printed.
13. The words "was then" are
here inserted in the transcript.
14. The word "The" is here
inserted in the transcript.
15. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
16. In the transcript these
three lines are changed to read as follows: "Several clauses, — for
coining money — for regulating foreign coin, — for fixing the
standard of weights and measures, — were agreed to, nem. Con."
17. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
18. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
19. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina,
Georgia, aye — 6; New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, North Carolina, no — 5."
20. The word "Mr." is
substituted in the transcript for "Col."
21. The word "that" is
substituted in the transcript for "which."
22. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Virginia, *23 North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 9; New Jersey, Maryland, no
— 2."
*23. This vote in the
affirmative by Virga. was occasioned by the acquiescence of Mr.
Madison who became satisfied that striking out the words would not
disable the Govt. from the use of public notes as far as they could
be safe & proper; & would only cut off the pretext for a paper
currency, 24 and particularly
for making the bills a tender 24
either for public or private debts.
24. The transcript italicizes
the words "paper currency" and "a tender."
25. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.