The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
FRIDAY
AUGUST 17th.
IN CONVENTION
Art VII. Sect. 1. 1,
2 resumed. on the clause "to appoint
3 Treasurer by ballot."
Mr. GHORUM moved to insert
"joint" before ballot, as more convenient as well as reasonable,
than to require the separate concurrence of the Senate.
Mr. PINKNEY 2ds. the motion.
Mr. SHERMAN opposed it as favoring the larger
States.
Mr. READ moved to strike out
the clause, leaving the appointment of the Treasurer as of other
officers to the Executive. The Legislature was an improper body for
appointments. Those of the State legislatures were a proof of it.
The Executive being responsible would make a good choice.
Mr. MERCER 2ds. the motion of
Mr. Read.
On the motion for inserting the word "joint" before ballot N. H.
ay. Mas. ay. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S.
C. ay. Geo. ay. 4
Col. MASON in opposition to Mr. Reads
motion desired it might be considered to whom the money would
belong; if to the people, the legislature representing the people
ought to appoint the keepers of it.
On striking out the clause as amended by inserting "Joint" N. H.
no. Mas. no. Ct. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C. no. S.
C. ay. Geo. no. 5
6 "To constitute inferior
tribunals" 7 agreed to nem. con.
8
"To make rules as to captures on land & water" — do. d
9, 6 "To
declare the law and punishment of piracies and felonies &c" &c
10 considered.
Mr. MADISON moved to strike out
"and punishment" &c. 11
Mr. MASON doubts the safety of
it, considering the strict rule of construction in criminal cases.
He doubted also the propriety of taking the power in all these cases
wholly from the States.
Mr. GOVERNr. MORRIS
thought it would be necessary to extend the authority farther, so as
to provide for the punishment of counterfeiting in general. Bills of
exchange for example might be forged in one State and carried into
another:
It was suggested by some other member that foreign paper
might be counterfeited by Citizens; and that it might be politic to
provide by national authority for the punishment of it.
Mr. RANDOLPH did not conceive
that expunging "the punishment" would be a constructive exclusion of
the power. He doubted only the efficacy of the word "declare."
Mr. WILSON was in favor of the
motion. Strictness was not necessary in giving authority to enact
penal laws; though necessary in enacting & expounding them.
On motion 12 for striking out
"and punishment" as moved by Mr. Madison
N. H. no. Mas. ay. Ct. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C.
ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 13
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
moved to strike out "declare the law" and insert "punish" before
"piracies." and on the question N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. no. Pa. ay.
Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
14
Mr. MADISON, and Mr.
RANDOLPH moved to insert, "define &," before
"punish."
Mr. WILSON, thought "felonies"
sufficiently defined by common law.
Mr. DICKENSON concurred with
Mr. Wilson.
Mr. MERCER was in favor of the
amendment.
Mr. MADISON. felony at common
law is vague. It is also defective. One defect is supplied by Stat:
of Anne as to running away with vessels which at common law was a
breach of trust only. Besides no foreign law should be a standard
farther than 15 is expressly
adopted — If the laws of the States were to prevail on this subject,
the citizens of different States would be subject to different
punishments for the same offence at sea. There would be neither
uniformity nor stability in the law — The proper remedy for all
these difficulties was to vest the power proposed by the term
"define" in the Natl. legislature.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
would prefer designate to define, the latter being as
he he conceived, limited to the preexisting meaning. — It was said
by others to be applicable to the creating of offences also, and
therefore suited the case both of felonies & of piracies. The motion
of Mr. M. & Mr. R was agreed to.
Mr. ELSEWORTH enlarged the
motion so as to read "to define and punish piracies and felonies
committed on the high seas, counterfeiting the securities and
current coin of the U. States, and offences agst. the law of
Nations" which was agreed to nem. con.
16 "To subdue a rebellion in
any State, on the application of its legislature."
17
Mr. PINKNEY moved to strike out
"on the application of its legislature"
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
2ds.
Mr. L. MARTIN opposed it as
giving a dangerous & unnecessary power. The consent of the State
ought to precede the introduction of any extraneous force whatever.
Mr. MERCER supported the
opposition of Mr. Martin.
Mr. ELSEWORTH proposed to add
after "legislature" "or Executive."
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
The Executive may possibly be at the head of the Rebellion. The
Genl. Govt. should enforce obedience in all cases where it may be
necessary.
Mr. ELSEWORTH. In many cases
The Genl. Govt. ought not to be able to interpose, unless called
upon. He was willing to vary his motion so as to read, "or without
it when the legislature cannot meet."
Mr. GERRY was agst. letting
loose the myrmidons of the U. States on a State without its own
consent. The States will be the best Judges in such cases. More
blood would have been spilt in Massts. in the late insurrection, if
the Genl. authority had intermeddled.
Mr. LANGDON was for striking
out as moved by Mr. Pinkney. The apprehension of the national force,
will have a salutary effect in preventing insurrections.
Mr. RANDOLPH. If the Natl.
Legislature is to judge whether the State legislature can or cannot
meet, that amendment would make the clause as objectionable as the
motion of Mr. Pinkney.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
We are acting a very strange part. We first form a strong man to
protect us, and at the same time wish to tie his hands behind him,
The legislature may surely be trusted with such a power to preserve
the public tranquility.
On the motion to add "or without it [application] when the
legislature cannot meet" 18
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. ay. Pa. divd. Del. no. Md. no. Va. ay. N.
C. divd. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 19
So agreed to — 20
Mr. MADISON and Mr.
DICKENSON moved to insert as explanatory,
after "State" — "against the Government thereof" There might be a
rebellion agst. the U. States — which 21
was Agreed to nem. con.
On the clause as amended N. H. ay. Mas *22
abst. Ct. ay. Pen. abst. Del. no. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C.
no. Georg. ay — so it was lost. 23
24 "To make war"
Mr. PINKNEY opposed the vesting
this power in the Legislature. Its proceedings were too slow. It wd.
meet but once a year. The Hs. of Reps. would be too numerous for
such deliberations. The Senate would be the best depositary, being
more acquainted with foreign affairs, and most capable of proper
resolutions. If the States are equally represented in
25 Senate, so as to give no advantage to
25 large States, the power will
notwithstanding be safe, as the small have their all at stake in
such cases as well as the large States. It would be singular for one
authority to make war, and another peace.
Mr. BUTLER. The objections
agst. the Legislature lie in 26
great degree agst. the Senate. He was for vesting the power in the
President, who will have all the requisite qualities, and will not
make war but when the Nation will support it. Mr. MADISON
and Mr. GERRY moved to insert "declare,"
striking out "make" war; leaving to the Executive the power
to repel sudden attacks.
Mr. SHARMAN thought it stood
very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence
war. "Make" 27 better than
"declare" the latter narrowing the power too much.
Mr. GERRY never expected to
hear in a republic a motion to empower the Executive alone to
declare war.
Mr. ELSWORTH. there is a
material difference between the cases of making war and
making peace. It shd. be more easy to get out of war, than
into it. War also is a simple and overt declaration. peace attended
with intricate & secret negociations.
Mr. MASON was agst. giving the
power of war to the Executive, because not safely to be trusted with
it; or to the Senate, because not so constructed as to be entitled
to it. He was for clogging rather than facilitating war; but for
facilitating peace. He preferred "declare" to "make."
On the motion to insert declare — in place of make,
it was agreed to. N. H. no. Mas. abst. Cont. no.
*29 Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S.
C. ay. Geo. ay. 31
Mr. PINKNEY's motion to strike
out 32 whole clause,
33 disagd. to without call of
States.
Mr. BUTLER moved to give the
Legislature 32 power of peace,
as they were to have that of war.
Mr. GERRY 2ds. him. 8 Senators
may possibly exercise the power if vested in that body, and 14 if
all should be present; and may consequently give up part of the U.
States. The Senate are more liable to be corrupted by an Enemy than
the whole Legislature.
On the motion for adding "and peace" after "war"
34 N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. Pa. no. Del. no.
Md. no. Va. no. N. C. no S. C. no. Geo. no. 35
Adjourned
1. See ante.
2. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
3. The word "a" is here inserted
in the transcript.
4. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; Connecticut, New Jersey,
Maryland, no — 3."
5. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, aye — 4;
New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina,
Georgia, no — 6."
6. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
7. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
8. The phrase "as also the
clause" is here inserted in the transcript.
9. The words "do. do." are
omitted in the transcript.
10. The word "being" is here
inserted in the transcript.
11. In the transcript the
following phrase is here added: "after the words, ' To declare the
law."'
12. The words "the question" are
substituted in the transcript for "motion."
13. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; New Hampshire,
Connecticut, Maryland, no — 3."
14. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware,
Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; Connecticut, Virginia,
North Carolina, no — 3."
15. The word "it" is here
inserted in the transcript.
16. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
17. The phrase "was next
considered" is here inserted in the transcript.
18. The phrase "it was agreed
to" is here added in the transcript.
19. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Connecticut, Virginia, South Carolina,
Georgia, aye — 5; Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, no — 3;
Pennsylvania, North Carolina, divided."
20. The words "So agreed to" are
omitted in the transcript.
21. The words "The motion" are
substituted in the transcript for "which."
*22. In the printed Journal, Mas.
no.
23. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Connecticut, Virginia, Georgia, aye — 4;
Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, no — 4;
Massachusetts, 22 Pennsylvania,
absent. So it was lost."
24. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
25. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
26. The word "a" is here
inserted in the transcript.
27. The word "is" is here
inserted in the transcript.
28. The transcript here inserts
the following: "Connecticut voted in the negative; but."
*29. On the remark by Mr. King
that "make" war might be understood to "conduct" it which was an
Executive function, Mr. Elseworth gave up his objection, and the
vote of Cont. 30 was changed to
— ay.
30. The words "of Cont. are
omittd in the transcript.
31. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Connecticut, *29
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, aye — 8; New Hampshire, no — 1; Massachusetts,
absent."
32. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
33. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
34. The transcript here adds the
following: "it was unanimously negatived."