The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
SATURDAY
AUGUST 25, 1787
1 IN
CONVENTION
The 1st. clause of 1 Sect. of art: VII 2
being reconsidered
Col. MASON objected to the term "shall" —
fullfil the engagements & discharge the debts &c as too strong. It
may be impossible to comply with it. The Creditors should be kept in
the same plight. They will in one respect be necessarily and
properly in a better. The Government will be more able to pay them.
The use of the term shall will beget speculations and increase the
pestilent practice of stock-jobbing. There was a great distinction
between original creditors & those who purchased fraudulently of the
ignorant and distressed. He did not mean to include those who have
bought Stock in open market. He was sensible of the difficulty of
drawing the line in this case, but He did not wish to preclude the
attempt. Even fair purchasers at 4. 5. 6. 8 for 1 did not stand on
the same footing with 3 first
Holders, supposing them not to be blameable. The interest they
receive even in paper is equal to their purchase money. What he
particularly wished was to leave the door open for buying up the
securities, which he thought would be precluded by the term "shall"
as requiring nominal payment, & which was not inconsistent with his
ideas of public faith. He was afraid also the word shall, might
extend to all the old continental paper.
Mr. LANGDON wished to do no
more than leave the Creditors in statu quo.
Mr. GERRY said that for himself
he had no interest in the question being not possessed of more of
the securities than would, by the interest, pay his taxes. He would
observe however that as the public had received the value of the
literal amount, they ought to pay that value to some body. The
frauds on the soldiers ought to have been foreseen. These poor &
ignorant people could not but part with their securities. There are
other creditors who will part with any thing rather than be cheated
of the capital of their advances. The interest of the States he
observed was different on this point, some having more, others less
than their proportion of the paper. Hence the idea of a scale for
reducing its value had arisen. If the public faith would admit, of
which he was not clear, he would not object to a revision of the
debt so far as to compel restitution to the ignorant & distressed,
who have been defrauded. As to Stock-jobbers he saw no reason for
the censures thrown on them. They keep up the value of the paper.
Without them there would be no market.
Mr. BUTLER said he meant
neither to increase nor diminish the security of the creditors.
Mr. RANDOLPH moved to postpone
the clause in favor of the following "All debts contracted &
engagements entered into, by or under the authority of Congs. shall
be as valid agst. the U. States under this constitution as under the
Confederation." DOCr. JOHNSON.
The debts are debts of the U- S- of the great Body of America.
Changing the Government can not change the obligation of the U- S-
which devolves of course on the New Government. Nothing was in his
opinion necessary to be said. If any thing, it should be a mere
declaration as moved by Mr. Randolph.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS,
said he never had become a public Creditor that he might urge with
more propriety the compliance with public faith. He had always done
so and always would, and preferr'd the term shall as most explicit.
As to buying up the debt, the term shall was not inconsistent with
it, if provision be first made for paying the interest: if not, such
an expedient was a mere evasion. He was content to say nothing as
the New Government would be bound of course — but would prefer the
clause with the term "shall, because it would create many friends to
the plan.
On Mr. Randolph's Motion
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. no Del. ay. Maryd. ay
Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo ay. 4
Mr. SHERMAN thought it
necessary to connect with the clause for laying taxes duties &c an
express provision for the object of the old debts &c — and moved to
add to the 1st. clause of 1st. sect. art VII "for the payment of
said debts and for the defraying the expences that shall be incurred
for the common defence and general welfare."
The proposition, as being unnecessary was disagreed to,
Connecticut alone, being in the affirmative.
The Report of the Committee of eleven [see friday the 24th.
instant] being taken up,
Genl. PINKNEY moved to strike
out the words "the year eighteen hundred" as the year limiting the
importation of slaves, and to insert the words "the year eighteen
hundred and eight"
Mr. GHORUM 2ded. the motion
Mr. MADISON. Twenty years will
produce all the mischief that can be apprehended from the liberty to
import slaves. So long a term will be more dishonorable to the
National 5 character than to say
nothing about it in the Constitution.
On the motion; which passed in the affirmative.
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. ay. Va.
no. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 6
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
was for making the clause read at once, " 7
importation of slaves into N. Carolina, S. Carolina & Georgia shall
not be prohibited &c." This he said would be most fair and would
avoid the ambiguity by which, under the power with regard to
naturalization, the liberty reserved to the States might be
defeated. He wished it to be known also that this part of the
Constitution was a compliance with those States. If the change of
language however should be objected to by the members from those
States, he should not urge it.
Col: MASON was not against using the term
"slaves" but agst. naming N. C. S. C. & Georgia, lest it should give
offence to the people of those States.
Mr. SHERMAN liked a description
better than the terms proposed, which had been declined by the old
Congs. & were not pleasing to some people.
Mr. CLYMER concurred with Mr.
Sherman
Mr. WILLIAMSON said that both
in opinion & practice he was against slavery; but thought it more in
favor of humanity, from a view of all circumstances, to let in S. C.
& Georgia on those terms, than to exclude them from the Union.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
withdrew his motion.
Mr. DICKENSON wished the clause
to be confined to the States which had not themselves prohibited the
importation of slaves, and for that purpose moved to amend the
clause so as to read "The importation of slaves into such of the
States as shall permit the same shall not be prohibited by the
Legislature of the U- S- until the year 1808" — which was disagreed
to nem: cont: 8
The first part of the report was then agreed to, amended as
follows.
"The migration or importation of such persons as the several
States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be
prohibited by the Legislature prior to the year 1808."
| N. H. Mas. Con. Md. N. C. S. C. Geo: |
ay 9 |
| N. J. Pa. Del. Virga.............. |
no 10 |
Mr. BALDWIN in order to
restrain & more explicitly define "the average duty" moved to strike
out of the 2d. part the words "average of the duties laid on
imports" and insert "common impost on articles not enumerated" which
was agreed to nem: cont:
Mr. SHERMAN was agst. this 2d.
part, as acknowledging men to be property, by taxing them as such
under the character of slaves.
Mr. KING & Mr. LANGDON
considered this as the price of the 1st. part.
Genl. PINKNEY admitted that it
was so.
Col: MASON. Not to tax, will be equivalent
to a bounty on the importation of slaves.
Mr. GHORUM thought that Mr.
Sherman should consider the duty, not as implying that slaves are
property, but as a discouragement to the importation of them.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
remarked that as the clause now stands it implies that the
Legislature may tax freemen imported.
Mr. SHERMAN in answer to Mr.
Ghorum observed that the smallness of the duty shewed revenue to be
the object, not the discouragement of the importation.
Mr. MADISON thought it wrong to
admit in the Constitution the idea that there could be property in
men. The reason of duties did not hold, as slaves are not like
merchandize, consumed, &c
Col. MASON (in answr. to Govr. Morris) the
provision as it stands was necessary for the case of Convicts in
order to prevent the introduction of them.
It was finally agreed nem: contrad: to make the clause read "but
a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation not exceeding ten
dollars for each person," and then the 2d. part as amended was
agreed to.
Sect 5. art. VII was agreed to nem: con: as reported.
Sect. 6. art. VII. in the Report, was postponed.
On motion of Mr. MADISON 2ded.
by Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
Art VIII was reconsidered and after the words "all treaties made,"
were inserted nem: con: the words "or which shall be made" This
insertion was meant to obviate all doubt concerning the force of
treaties preexisting, by making the words "all treaties made" to
refer to them, as the words inserted would refer to future treaties.
Mr. CARROL & Mr. L.
MARTIN expressed their apprehensions, and the
probable apprehensions of their constituents, that under the power
of regulating trade the General Legislature, might favor the ports
of particular States, by requiring vessels destined to or from other
States to enter & clear thereat, as vessels belonging or bound to
Baltimore, to enter & clear at Norfolk &c They moved the following
proposition
"The Legislature of the U: S: shall not oblige vessels belonging
to citizens thereof, or to foreigners, to enter or pay duties or
imposts in any other State than in that to which they may be bound,
or to clear out in any other than the State in which their cargoes
may be laden on board; nor shall any privilege or immunity be
granted to any vessels on entering or clearing out, or paying duties
or imposts in one State in preference to another"
Mr. GHORUM thought such a
precaution unnecessary; & that the revenue might be defeated, if
vessels could run up long rivers, through the jurisdiction of
different States without being required to enter, with the
opportunity of landing & selling their cargoes by the way.
Mr. Mc.HENRY & Genl.
PINKNEY made the following propositions
"Should it be judged expedient by the Legislature of the U. S. that
one or more ports for collecting duties or imposts other than those
ports of entrance & clearance already established by the respective
States, should be established, the Legislature of the U. S. shall
signify the same to the Executives of the respective States,
ascertaining the number of such ports judged necessary; to be laid
by the said Executives before the Legislatures of the States at
their next Session; and the Legislature of the U. S. shall not have
the power of fixing or establishing the particular ports for
collecting duties or imposts in any State, except the Legislature of
such State shall neglect to fix and establish the same during their
first session to be held after such notification by the Legislature
of the U. S. to the Executive of such State"
"All duties imposts & excises, prohibitions or restraints laid or
made by the Legislature of the U. S. shall be uniform & equal
throughout the U. S."
These several propositions were referred, nem: con: to a
Committee composed of a member from each State. The committee
appointed by ballot were Mr. Langdon, Mr. Ghorum, Mr. Sherman, Mr.
Dayton, Mr. Fitzimmons, Mr. Read, Mr. Carrol, Mr. Mason, Mr.
Williamson, Mr. Butler, Mr. Few.
On the question now taken on Mr. Dickinson motion of yesterday,
allowing appointments to offices, to be referred by the Genl.
Legislature to the Executives of the Several States" as a farther
amendment to sect. 2, art. X. the votes were,
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. divided. Va. ay.
N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. ay. 12
In amendment of the same section, 13
"other public Ministers" were inserted after "ambassadors."
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
moved to strike out of the section — "and may correspond with the
supreme Executives of the several States" as unnecessary and
implying that he could not correspond with others.
Mr. BROOME 2ded. him.
On the question
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C.
ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 14
15 "Shall receive ambassadors
& other public Ministers," 16
agreed to, nem. con.
Mr. SHERMAN moved to amend the
"power to grant reprieves & pardon 17"
so as to read "to grant reprieves until the ensuing session of the
Senate, and pardons with consent of the Senate."
On the question
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. Pa. no Md. no. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C.
no. Geo. no. 18
19 "except in cases of
impeachment" 20 inserted nem:
con: after "pardon" 17
On the question to agree to — "but his pardon shall not be
pleadable in bar" 21
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C.
ay. S. C. ay. Geo. no. 22
Adjourned
1. The year "1787" is omitted in
the transcript
2. See ante.
3. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
4. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, aye — 10; Pennsylvania, no — 1."
5. The word "American" is
substituted in the transcript for "National."
6. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 7; New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, no — 4."
7. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
8. In the printed Journal, Cont.
Virga. & Georgia voted in the affirmative.
9. The figure "7" is here
inserted in the transcript.
10. The figure "4" is here
inserted in the transcript.
11. See ante.
12. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Connecticut, Virginia, Georgia, aye — 3; New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, South
Carolina, no — 6; Maryland, divided."
13. The expression "the words"
is here inserted in the transcript.
14. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye —
9; Maryland, no — 1."
15. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
16. The word "was" is here
inserted in the transcript.
17. The transcript uses the word
"pardon" in the plural.
18. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Connecticut, aye — 1; New Hampshire, Massachusetts,
Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, no — 8."
19. The expression "the words"
is here inserted in the transcript.
20. The word "were" is here
inserted in the transcript.
21. The phrase "It passed in the
negative" is here inserted in the transcript.
22. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, aye
— 4; Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia,
Georgia, no — 6."