The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
WEDNESDAY
SEPr 5.
1787 1 IN
CONVENTION
Mr. BREARLEY from the Committee
of Eleven made a farther report as follows,
(1) To add to the clause "to declare war" the words "and
grant letters of marque and reprisal"
(2) To add to the clause "to raise and support armies" the
words "but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a
longer term than two years"
(3) Instead of sect: 12. art 6. say — "All bills for raising
revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives, and shall
be subject to alterations and amendments by the Senate: no money
shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of
appropriations made by law."
(4) Immediately before the last clause of sect. 1. art. 7.
insert "To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever
over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may by
Cession of particular States and the acceptance of the Legislature
become the seat of the Government of the U. S. and to exercise like
authority over all places purchased for the erection of Forts,
Magazines, Arsenals, Dock-Yards, and other needful buildings"
(5) "To promote the progress of Science and
2 useful arts by securing for limited times to
authors & inventors, the exclusive right to their respective
writings and discoveries"
This report being taken up. — The (1) clause was agreed to nem:
con:
To the (2) clause Mr. GERRY
objected that it admitted of appropriations to an army, for two
years instead of one, for which he could not conceive a reason. that
it implied that 3 there was to be
a standing army which he inveighed against as dangerous to liberty,
as unnecessary even for so great an extent of Country as this, and
if necessary, some restriction on the number & duration ought to be
provided: Nor was this a proper time for such an innovation. The
people would not bear it.
Mr. SHERMAN remarked that the
appropriations were permitted only, not required to be for two
years. As the Legislature is to be biennially elected, it would be
inconvenient to require appropriations to be for one year, as there
might be no Session within the time necessary to renew them. He
should himself he said like a reasonable restriction on the number
and continuance of an army in time of peace.
The clause (2) was 4 agreed to
nem: con:
The (3) clause, Mr. GOVr.
MORRIS moved to postpone. It had been agreed
to in the Committee on the ground of compromise, and he should feel
himself at liberty to dissent to 5
it, if on the whole he should not be satisfied with certain other
parts to be settled. —
Mr. PINKNEY 2ded. the motion
Mr. SHERMAN was for giving
immediate ease to those who looked on this clause as of great
moment, and for trusting to their concurrence in other proper
measures.
On the question for postponing
N. H. ay. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va.
no. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 6
So much of the (4) clause as related to the seat of Government
was agreed to nem: con:
On the residue, to wit, "to exercise like authority over all
places purchased for forts &c.
Mr. GERRY contended that this
power might be made use of to enslave any particular State by buying
up its territory, and that the strongholds proposed would be a means
of awing the State into an undue obedience to the Genl. Government.
Mr. KING thought himself the
provision unnecessary, the power being already involved: but would
move to insert after the word "purchased" the words "by the consent
of the Legislature of the State" This would certainly make the power
safe.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
2ded. the motion, which was agreed to nem: con: as was then the
residue of the clause as amended.
The (5) clause was agreed to nem: con:
The following resolution & order being reported from the
Committee of eleven, to wit,
"Resolved that the U. S. in Congress be requested to allow and
cause to be paid to the Secretary and other officers of this
Convention such sums in proportion to their respective times of
service, as are allowed to the Secretary & similar officers of
Congress."
"Ordered that the Secretary make out & transmit to the Treasury
office of the U. S. an account for the said Services, & for the
incidental expenses of this Convention"
The resolution & order were separately agreed to nem: con:
Mr. GERRY gave notice that he
should move to reconsider articles XIX. XX. XXI. XXII.
Mr. WILLIAMSON gave like notice
as to the Article fixing the number of Representatives, which he
thought too small. He wished also to allow Rho: Island more than
one, as due to her probable number of people, and as proper to
stifle any pretext arising from her absence on the occasion.
The Report made yesterday as to the appointment of the Executive
being 7 taken up.
Mr. PINKNEY renewed his
opposition to the mode, arguing 1. 8
that the electors will not have sufficient knowledge of the fittest
men, & will be swayed by an attachment to the eminent men of their
respective States. Hence 2dly. the dispersion of the votes would
leave the appointment with the Senate, and as the President's
reappointment will thus depend on the Senate he will be the mere
creature of that body. 3. 8 He
will combine with the Senate agst. the House of Representatives. 4.
8 This change in the mode of
election was meant to get rid of the ineligibility of the President
a second time, whereby he will become fixed for life under the
auspices of the Senate
Mr. GERRY did not object to
this plan of constituting the Executive in itself, but should be
governed in his final vote by the powers that may be given to the
President.
Mr. RUTLIDGE was much opposed
to the plan reported by the Committee. It would throw the whole
power into the Senate. He was also against a re-eligibility. He
moved to postpone the Report under consideration & take up the
original plan of appointment by the Legislature, to wit. "He shall
be elected by joint ballot by the Legislature to which election a
majority of the votes of the members present shall be required: He
shall hold his office during the term of seven years; but shall not
be elected a second time."
On this motion to postpone
N. H. divd. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. no.
Va. no. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. no. 9
Col. MASON admitted that there were
objections to an appointment by the Legislature as originally
planned. He had not yet made up his mind, but would state his
objections to the mode proposed by the Committee. 1.
10 It puts the appointment in fact into the
hands of the Senate, as it will rarely happen that a majority of the
whole votes will fall on any one candidate: and as the Existing
President will always be one of the 5 highest, his reappointment
will of course depend on the Senate. 2. 10
Considering the powers of the President & those of the Senate, if a
coalition should be established between these two branches, they
will be able to subvert the Constitution — The great objection with
him would be removed by depriving the Senate of the eventual
election. He accordingly moved to strike out the words "if such
number be a majority of that of the electors."
Mr. WILLIAMSON 2ded. the
motion. He could not agree to the clause without some such
modification. He preferred making the highest tho' not having a
majority of the votes, President, to a reference of the matter to
the Senate. Referring the appointment to the Senate lays a certain
foundation for corruption & aristocracy.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
thought the point of less consequence than it was supposed on both
sides. It is probable that a majority of votes will fall on the same
man. As each elector is to give two votes, more than 1/4 will give a
majority. Besides as one vote is to be given to a man out of the
State, and as this vote will not be thrown away, 1/2 the votes will
fall on characters eminent & generally known. Again if the President
shall have given satisfaction, the votes will turn on him of course,
and a majority of them will reappoint him, without resort to the
Senate: If he should be disliked, all disliking him, would take care
to unite their votes so as to ensure his being supplanted.
Col. MASON those who think there is no
danger of there not being a majority for the same person in the
first instance, ought to give up the point to those who think
otherwise.
Mr. SHERMAN reminded the
opponents of the new mode proposed that if the small states had the
advantage in the Senate's deciding among the five highest
candidates, the large States would have in fact the nomination of
these candidates
On the motion of Col: Mason
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. ay.
*11 Va. no. N. C. ay. S. C. no.
Geo. no. 12
Mr. WILSON moved to strike out
"Senate" and insert the word "Legislature"
Mr. MADISON considered it as
13 a primary object to render an
eventual resort to any part of the Legislature improbable. He was
apprehensive that the proposed alteration would turn the attention
of the large States too much to the appointment of candidates,
instead of aiming at an effectual appointment of the officer, as the
large States would predominate in the Legislature which would have
the final choice out of the Candidates. Whereas if the Senate in
which the small States predominate should have this
14 final choice, the concerted effort of the
large States would be to make the appointment in the first instance
conclusive.
Mr. RANDOLPH. We have in some
revolutions of this plan made a bold stroke for Monarchy. We are now
doing the same for an aristocracy. He dwelt on the tendency of such
an influence in the Senate over the election of the President in
addition to its other powers, to convert that body into a real &
dangerous Aristocracy.
Mr. DICKINSON was in favor of
giving the eventual election to the Legislature, instead of the
Senate. It was too much influence to be superadded to that body.
On the question moved by Mr. Wilson
N. H. divd. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. no. Md. no.
Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. no. 15
Mr. MADISON & Mr. WILLIAMSON
moved to strike out the word "majority" and insert "one third" so
that the eventual power might not be exercised if less than a
majority, but not less than 1/3 of the Electors should vote for the
same person.
Mr. GERRY objected that this
would put it in the power of three or four States to put in whom
they pleased.
Mr. WILLIAMSON. There are seven
States which do not contain one third of the people. If the Senate
are to appoint, less than one sixth of the people will have the
power.
On the question
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. no. Va.
ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. no. 16
Mr. GERRY suggested that the
eventual election should be made by six Senators and seven
Representatives chosen by joint ballot of both Houses.
Mr. KING observed that the
influence of the Small States in the Senate was somewhat balanced by
the influence of the large States in bringing forward the
candidates; *17 and also by the
Concurrence of the small States in the Committee in the clause
vesting the exclusive origination of Money bills in the House of
Representatives.
Col: MASON moved to strike out the word
"five" and insert the word "three" as the highest candidates for the
Senate to choose out of.
Mr. GERRY 2ded. the motion
Mr. SHERMAN would sooner give
up the plan. He would prefer seven or thirteen.
On the question moved by Col: Mason & Mr. Gerry
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. no. Delaware Md. no. Va.
ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. no. 19
Mr. SPAIGHT and Mr.
RUTLIDGE moved to strike out "five" and
insert "thirteen" — to which all the States disagreed — except N. C.
& S. C.
Mr. MADISON & Mr. WILLIAMSON
moved to insert after "Electors" the words "who shall have balloted"
so that the non voting electors not being counted might not increase
the number necessary as a majority of the whole, to decide the
choice without the agency of the Senate.
On this question
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. no. Md. ay. Va.
ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. no. 20
Mr. DICKINSON moved, in order
to remove ambiguity from the intention of the clause as explained by
the vote, to add, after the words "if such number be a majority of
the whole number of the electors" the word "appointed"
On this motion
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Con: ay. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Delaware Md. ay.
Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 21
Col: MASON. As the mode of appointment is
now regulated, he could not forbear expressing his opinion that it
is utterly inadmissible. He would prefer the Government of Prussia
to one which will put all power into the hands of seven or eight
men, and fix an Aristocracy worse than absolute monarchy. The words
"and of their giving their votes" being inserted on motion for that
purpose, after the words "The Legislature may determine the time of
chusing and assembling the electors."
The House adjourned
1. They year "1787" is omitted in
the transcript.
2. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
3. The word "that" is omitted in
the transcript.
4. The word "then" is here
inserted in the transcript.
5. The word "to" is crossed out
in the transcript and "from" is written above it.
6. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye —
9; Massachusetts, Virginia, no — 2."
7. The word "then" is here
inserted in the transcript.
8. The figures "1," "3" and "4"
are changed to "first," "Thirdly" and "Fourthly" in the transcript.
9. In the transcript the vote
reads: "North Carolina, South Carolina, aye — 2; Massachusetts,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia,
Georgia, no — 8; New Hampshire, divided."
10. The figures "1" and "2" are
changed in the transcript to "First" and "Secondly."
*11. In printed Journal Maryland
— no.
12. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Maryland, *11 North
Carolina, aye; the other nine States, no."
13. The word "as" is stricken
out in the transcript.
14. The word "the" is
substituted in the transcript for "this."
15. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, aye — 3;
Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, North
Carolina, Georgia, no — 7; New Hampshire, divided."
16. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Virginia, North Carolina, aye; the other nine States, no."
*17. This explains the
compromise mentioned above 18 by
Mr. Govr. Morris. Col. Mason Mr. Gerry & other members from large
States set great value on this privilege of originating money bills.
Of this the members from the small States, with some from the large
States who wished a high mounted Govt endeavored to avail
themselves, by making that privilege, the price of arrangements in
the constitution favorable to the small States, and to the elevation
of the Government.
18. The words "alluded to" are
substituted in the transcript for "mentioned above."
19. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Virginia, North Carolina, aye; nine States, no."
20. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, aye — 4;
New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware,
South Carolina, Georgia, no — 7."
21. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 9;
Virginia, North Carolina, no — 2."