The Debates in
the Federal Convention of 1787
|
|
|
As Recorded by James
Madison |
Return to
Federal Debates Calendar
FRIDAY
SEPr 7.
1787. 1 IN
CONVENTION
The mode of constituting the Executive being resumed, Mr.
RANDOLPH moved, to insert in the first
Section of the report made yesterday 2
"The Legislature may declare by law what officer of the U. S.
shall act as President in case of the death, resignation, or
disability of the President and Vice-President; and such officer
shall act accordingly until the time of electing a President shall
arrive."
Mr. MADISON observed that this,
as worded, would prevent a supply of the vacancy by an intermediate
election of the President, and moved to substitute — "until such
disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
*3
Mr. GOVERNr. MORRIS
2ded. the motion, which was agreed to. It seemed to be an objection
to the provision with some, that according to the process
established for chusing the Executive there would be difficulty in
effecting it at other than the fixed periods; with others, that the
Legislature was restrained in the temporary appointment to "officers"
of the U. S: They wished it to be at liberty to appoint
others than such.
On the Motion of Mr. Randolph as amended, it passed in the
affirmative
N. H. divided. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Del. no. Md.
ay. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 4
Mr. GERRY moved "that in the
election of President by the House of Representatives, no State
shall vote by less than three members, and where that number may not
be allotted to a State, it shall be made up by its Senators; and a
concurrence of a majority of all the States shall be necessary to
make such choice." Without some such provision five individuals
might possibly be competent to an election; these being a majority
of two thirds of the existing number of States; and two thirds being
a quorum for this business.
Mr. MADISON 2ded. the motion
Mr. READ observed that the
States having but one member only in the House of Reps. would be in
danger of having no vote at all in the election: the sickness or
absence either of the Representative or one of the Senators would
have that effect.
Mr. MADISON replied that, if
one member of the House of Representatives should be left capable of
voting for the State, the states having one Representative only
would still be subject to that danger. He thought it an evil that so
small a number at any rate should be authorized, to elect.
Corruption would be greatly facilitated by it. The mode itself was
liable to this further weighty objection that the representatives of
a Minority of the people, might reverse the choice of a
majority of the States and of the people. He
wished some cure for this inconveniency 5
might yet be provided.
Mr. GERRY withdrew the first
part of his motion; and on the, — Question on the 2d. part viz. "and
a concurrence of a majority of all the States shall be necessary to
make such choice" to follow the words "a member or members from two
thirds of the States" —
It was agreed to nem: con:
The section 2 (see Sepr. 4) requiring that the President should
be a natural-born Citizen, &c & have been resident for fourteen
years, & be thirty five years of age, was agreed to nem: con:
6 Section 3. (see Sepr. 4).
"The vice President shall be ex-officio President of the Senate"
Mr. GERRY opposed this
regulation. We might as well put the President himself at the head
of the Legislature. The close intimacy that must subsist between the
President & vice-president makes it absolutely improper. He was
agst. having any vice President.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
The vice president then will be the first heir apparent that ever
loved his father. If there should be no vice president, the
President of the Senate would be temporary successor, which would
amount to the same thing.
Mr. SHERMAN saw no danger in
the case. If the vice-President were not to be President of the
Senate, he would be without employment, and some member by being
made President must be deprived of his vote, unless when an equal
division of votes might happen in the Senate, which would be but
seldom.
Mr. RANDOLPH concurred in the
opposition to the clause.
Mr. WILLIAMSON, observed that
such an officer as vice-President was not wanted. He was introduced
only for the sake of a valuable mode of election which required two
to be chosen at the same time.
Col: MASON, thought the office of
vice-President an encroachment on the rights of the Senate; and that
it mixed too much the Legislative & Executive, which as well as the
Judiciarydepartments, 7 ought to
be kept as separate as possible. He took occasion to express his
dislike of any reference whatever of the power to make appointments
to either branch of the Legislature. On the other hand he was averse
to vest so dangerous a power in the President alone. As a method for
avoiding both, he suggested that a privy Council of six members to
the president should be established; to be chosen for six years by
the Senate, two out of the Eastern two out of the middle, and two
out of the Southern quarters of the Union, & to go out in rotation
two every second year; the concurrence of the Senate to be required
only in the appointment of Ambassadors, and in making treaties,
which are more of a legislative nature. This would prevent the
constant sitting of the Senate which he thought dangerous, as well
as keep the departments separate & distinct. It would also save the
expence of constant sessions of the Senate. He had he said always
considered the Senate as too unwieldy & expensive for appointing
officers, especially the smallest, such as tide waiters &c. He had
not reduced his idea to writing, but it could be easily done if it
should be found acceptable.
On the question shall the vice President be ex officio President
of the Senate?
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del ay. Mas no. Va.
ay. N. C. abst. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 8
The other parts of the same Section (3) 9
were then agreed to.
The Section 4. — to wit, "The President by & with the advice and
consent of the Senate shall have power to make Treaties &c"
10
Mr. WILSON moved to add, after
the word "Senate" the words, "and House of Representatives." As
treaties he said are to have the operation of laws, they ought to
have the sanction of laws also. The circumstance of secrecy in the
business of treaties formed the only objection; but this he thought,
so far as it was inconsistent with obtaining the Legislative
sanction, was outweighed by the necessity of the latter.
Mr. SHERMAN thought the only
question that could be made was whether the power could be safely
trusted to the Senate. He thought it could; and that the necessity
of secresy in the case of treaties forbade a reference of them to
the whole Legislature.
Mr. FITZIMMONS 2ded. the motion
of Mr. Wilson, & on the question N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N. J.
no. Pa. ay. Del. no. Md. no. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.
11
The first sentence as to making treaties was then Agreed to: nem:
con:
12 "He shall nominate &c
Appoint Ambassadors &c."
Mr. WILSON objected to the mode
of appointing, as blending a branch of the Legislature with the
Executive. Good laws are of no effect without a good Executive; and
there can be no good Executive without a responsible appointment of
officers to execute. Responsibility is in a manner destroyed by such
an agency of the Senate. He would prefer the council proposed by
Col: Mason, provided its advice should not be made obligatory on the
President.
Mr. PINKNEY was against joining
the Senate in these appointments, except in the instance of
Ambassadors whom 13 he thought
ought not to be appointed by the President.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
said that as the President was to nominate, there would be
responsibility, and as the Senate was to concur, there would be
security. As Congress now make appointments there is no
responsibility.
Mr. GERRY. The idea of
responsibility in the nomination to offices is chimerical. The
President can not know all characters, and can therefore always
plead ignorance.
Mr. KING. As the idea of a
Council proposed by Col. Mason has been supported by Mr. Wilson, he
would remark that most of the inconveniencies charged on the Senate
are incident to a Council of Advice. He differed from those who
thought the Senate would sit constantly. He did not suppose it was
meant that all the minute officers were to be appointed by the
Senate, or any other original source, but by the higher officers of
the departments to which they belong. He was of opinion also that
the people wold be alarmed at an unnecessary creation of new Corps
which must increase the expence as well as influence of the
Government.
On the question on these words in the clause viz — "He shall
nominate & by & with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall
appoint ambassadors, and other public ministers (and Consuls)
14 Judges of the Supreme Court."
15 Agreed to nem: con: the
insertion of "and consuls" having first taken place.
On the question on the following words "And all other officers of
16 U.S."
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. no. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va.
ay. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. ay. 17
On motion of Mr. SPAIGHT —
"that the President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that
may happen during the recess of the Senate by granting Commissions
which shall expire at the end of the next Session of the Senate" It
was agreed to nem: con:
16 Section 4. "The President
by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall have power to
make Treaties" — "But no treaty shall be made without the consent
of two thirds of the members present" — this last
18 being before the House.
Mr. WILSON thought it
objectionable to require the concurrence of 2/3 which puts it in
19 the power of a minority to
controul the will of a majority.
Mr. KING concurred in the
objection; remarking that as the Executive was here joined in the
business, there was a check which did not exist in Congress where
The concurrence of 2/3 was required.
Mr. MADISON moved to insert
after the word "treaty" the words "except treaties of peace"
allowing these to be made with less difficulty than other treaties —
It was agreed to nem: con:
Mr. MADISON then moved to
authorise a concurrence of two thirds of the Senate to make treaties
of peace, without the concurrence of the President." — The President
he said would necessarily derive so much power and importance from a
state of war that he might be tempted, if authorised, to impede a
treaty of peace.
Mr. BUTLER 2ded. the motion
Mr. GORHAM thought the
precaution 20 unnecessary as the
means of carrying on the war would not be in the hands of the
President, but of the Legislature.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS
thought the power of the President in this case harmless; and that
no peace ought to be made without the concurrence of the President,
who was the general Guardian of the National interests.
Mr. BUTLER was strenuous for
the motion, as a necessary security against ambitious & corrupt
Presidents. He mentioned the late perfidious policy of the
Statholder in Holland; and the artifices of the Duke of Marlbro' to
prolong the war of which he had the management.
Mr. GERRY was of opinion that
in treaties of peace a greater rather than less proportion of votes
was necessary, than in other treaties. In Treaties of peace the
dearest interests will be at stake, as the fisheries, territory &c.
In treaties of peace also there is more dander to the extremities of
the Continent, of being sacrificed, than on any other occasions.
Mr. WILLIAMSON thought that
Treaties of peace should be guarded at least by requiring the same
concurrence as in other Treaties.
On the motion of Mr. Madison & Mr. Butler
N.H. no. Mas. no. Ct. no. N.J. no. Pa. no. Del. no. Md. ay. Va.
no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 21
On the part of the clause concerning treaties amended by the
exception as to Treaties of peace,
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. no. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va.
ay. N.C. ay. S.C. ay. Geo. no. 22
23 "and may require the
opinion in writing of the principal officer in each of the Executive
Departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their
respective offices," being before the House
Col: MASON *24
said that in rejecting a Council to the President we were about to
try an experiment on which the most despotic Governments had never
ventured. The Grand Signor himself had his Divan. He moved to
postpone the consideration of the clause in order to take up the
following
"That it be an instruction to the Committee of the States to
prepare a clause or clauses for establishing an Executive Council,
as a Council of State, for the President of the U. States, to
consist of six members, two of which from the Eastern, two from the
middle, and two from the Southern States, with a Rotation and
duration of office similar to those of the Senate; such Council to
be appointed by the Legislature or by the Senate."
Doctor FRANKLIN 2ded. the motion. We
seemed he said too much to fear cabals in appointments by a number,
and to have too much confidence in those of single persons.
Experience shewed that caprice, the intrigues of favorites &
mistresses, &c 25 were
nevertheless the means most prevalent in monarchies. Among instances
of abuse in such modes of appointment, he mentioned the many bad
Governors appointed in G. B. for the Colonies. He thought a Council
would not only be a check on a bad President but be a relief to a
good one.
Mr. GOVr. MORRIS.
The question of a Council was considered in the Committee, where it
was judged that the Presidt. by persuading his Council, to concur in
his wrong measures, would acquire their protection for them.
Mr. WILSON approved of a
Council in preference to making the Senate a party to appointmts.
Mr. DICKENSON was for a
Council. It wd. be a singular thing if the measures of the Executive
were not to undergo some previous discussion before the President.
Mr. MADISON was in favor of the
instruction to the Committee proposed by Col: Mason.
The motion of Mr. 26 Mason
was negatived. Maryd. ay. S.C. ay. Geo. ay — N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct.
no. N. J. no Pa. no. Del. no. Va. no. N C no.
27
On the question, 28
"authorising the President to call for the opinions of the Heads of
Departments, in writing": it passed in the affirmative, N. H. only
being no. *29
The clause was then unanimously agreed to —
Mr. WILLIAMSON & Mr.
SPAIGHT moved "that no Treaty of Peace
affecting Territorial rights shd.; be made without the concurrence
of two thirds of the members of the Senate present.
Mr. KING. It will be necessary
to look out for securities for some other rights, if this principle
be established; he moved to extend the motion — "to all present
rights of the U. States."
Adjourned
1. The year "1787" is omitted in
the transcript.
2. The words "the following" are
here inserted in the transcript.
*3. In the printed Journal this
amendment is put into the original Motion.
4. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, South
Carolina, Georgia, aye — 6; Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware,
North Carolina, no — 4; New Hampshire, divided."
5. The word "inconveniency" is
changed to "inconvenience" in the transcript.
6. This paragraph is changed in
the transcript to read as follows: "The third section, 'The
Vice-President shall be ex-officio President of the Senate'
being then considered."
7. The letter "s" is stricken
from the word "departments" in the transcript.
8. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 8; New Jersey,
Maryland, no — 2; North Carolina, absent."
9. The figure "3" is omitted in
the transcript.
10. The phrase "was then taken
up" is here added in the transcript.
11. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Pennsylvania, aye — 1; New Hampshire, Massachusetts,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, no — 10."
12. The words "On the clause"
are here inserted in the transcript.
13. The word "who" is
substituted in the transcript for "whom."
14. The word "and" is here
inserted in the transcript.
15. The words "it was" are here
inserted in the transcript.
16. The word "the" is here
inserted in the transcript.
17. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, aye — 9;
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, no — 2."
18. The words "being considered,
and the last clause" are substituted in the transcript for "this
last."
19. The word "into" is
substituted in the transcript for "in."
20. In the transcript the word
"precaution" is stricken out and the word "security" is written
above it.
21. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 3; New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware,
Virginia, North Carolina, no — 8."
22. In the transcript the vote
reads: "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, aye — 8; New
Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia, no — 3."
23. The words "The clause" are
here inserted in the transcript.
*24. In the printed Journal, Mr.
Madison is erroneously substituted for Col: Mason.
25. The character "&C" is
omitted in the transcript.
26. The word "Col." is
substituted in the transcript for "Mr."
27. In the transcript the vote
reads: "Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia, aye — 3; New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware,
Virginia, North Carolina, no — 8".
28. The word "for" is here
inserted in the transcript.
*29. Not so stated in the
Printed Journal; but conformable to the result — afterwards
appearing.